Walter & Ernie, thank you for your replies, but you both overlooked my second post which very clearly mentions a problem in IE9, which is by no means “an older browser.” And because so many silly folks in this planet still worship at the throne of Internet Explorer, especially here in Japan, turning up one’s nose at IE9 compatibility is something I don’t have the liberty to do.
Here it is again for you kind consideration:
CSS3 Corners doesn’t work right when used in conjunction with CSS3 Gradients in IE9 (Win7): The North Face - Locale Selector
Ernie, when it comes to payment, I think it would benefit the developer more in the long run if the Action was sold to the masses rather than just one individual being squeezed. For truly, how much can one person pay versus 50 people? But for the record, it’s not like I’ve not paid Action developers before. Paul Dunning offers some paid apps that I have purchased in the past. In most cases I need this functionality for company use, but my company won’t pay for my perfectionist quests, so I pay for those things out of my own pocket, despite the fact I have no personal use for it. But to keep a potential fee in perspective, all I am calling for is an improvement in current functionality. I consider “modern browser compatibility” a “fix” rather than “a new feature.” In other words, modern browser functionality should have been in there from the get-go, even if one strongly contends such would make the page code longer and/or be harder to develop.
But to be even more honest with you, Freeway should have this stuff built-in. What we’re really talking about here is sprucing up HTML boxes to make them look like what Steve Jobs wanted back in 1982 when the Mac was still in its conceptual stage — rounded corners, for crying out loud! Who doesn’t want that these days? And a gradient added to the mix makes it all the better. You can see just how much I like both on the following page in my company site, which current uses graphics I designed in Illustrator and then rasterized in Photoshop — much of which could stand to benefit from being converted into selectable text, if only I could get the CSS3 actions to play nice with IE:
http://www.kiramek.com/english/products/sciborg/TSL20.html
Like I said in my previous post, Freeway offers me a wonderfully convenient means of rounded corners on HTML boxes, making it beautifully compatible with all browsers via PNG graphics. But the serious downside is that it offers no CSS3 solution for modern browsers that support it. Conversely, these glorious CSS3 Actions offer modern browser functionality, but they seek to torch the past by refusing to offer any fall-back compatibility for browsers that don’t play well with CSS3.
Paradise comes to creative designers such as myself when those two concepts are merged—when you offer a CSS3 solution by default, with PNGs reserved only as a compatibility fall-back. Doing it that way should insure the page loads faster on CSS3 browsers (since no PNGs would be needed), and although loading he PNGs would be on slower browsers, at least they would see the page “as the designer intended” rather than seeing something broken. (The CSS3 solution also looks far better on iPad browsers that Freeway’s default PNG approach because the iPad shows seam lines — at least, it does in mobile Safari and the Mercury browser on my iPad3.)
David, thanks for your suggestion. But honestly, I am a finicky creative designer type, not a web programmer. As such, if your suggestion works to solve the problems I’ve outlined above, you will need to take me by the hand and guide me on exactly what I need to do in Freeway to implement it. If the Actions cannot be updated with much needed PNG fall-back, then I would be willing to implement some programming hacks to solve the problem. I just need a lot of help to know exactly how to go about it.
Again the concept is so simple folks — rounded corner HTML boxes, occasionally with a 3-stop gradient, fully compatible with mainstream browsers.
Thanks.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options