Further than what I’ve already said, I won’t debate FileMaker, what it can and can’t do, etc.
Your smilies, I assume, are to get me to agree with you entirely or somewhat in the inadequacy of FMP. I don’t. I was on the Servoy beta team for a few years, I like it in so far as it has its place and, too, has a fairly steep learning curve. To be honest, though, FMP “still” provides the challenges of calculation and custom function, which i enjoy. In addition, I literally have no time in the day to invest in other custom RAD apps. My clients want FMP, I provide what they want and I doubt that will change any time soon. That doesn’t mean I don’t check out Freeway 5, Run Rev, 4D, Servoy, and a few Cloud solutions as well just to hang in there!
Bart
Bart Bartholomay
HAB Marketing
3725 8th Lane
Vero Beach, FL 32960
772.299.6352
Filemaker Business Alliance
http://HABMarketing.com
On Jan 2, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Keith Martin wrote:
Sometime around 2/1/10 (at 14:13 -0500) Bart Bartholomay said:
What he says doesn’t apply to FileMaker.
Are you talking about designing the visual structure of a site with FMP? It has been a while since I did anything serious with FMP, but it is still a database tool rather than a seriously designer-satisfying layout tool…? 
NOT cost-effective unless they are, at the same time going to use the majority of what FMP offers to provide a served database to users in a LAN environment.
ExACTly. Which is where ‘served FMP’ (to simplify things massively) really shines. (Although I’d be tempted to murmer ‘Servoy’ at this point… 
k
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options