The whole point of the joke was to say “You break it, you bought it”
in a longer and more humorous way. You broke it in half, now you get
to keep both of the (broken, useless) pieces. In this context, once
you (as client) take delivery of the site, if you do anything with it
beyond uploading it to your Web root on your server, that’s on you.
Decide to change a bunch of filenames and now none of the links work,
that’s your choice and your responsibility.
I like where you’re going with this, though, Thomas – the idea I’m
getting from you is similar to the software architecture mantra of
“separating content from presentation”. Ordinary Freeway sites don’t
do this at all; or do so in a very weak manner through Master pages.
Freeway + a CMS does an excellent job of this, which is why for large
sites, or client-changed sites, they’re the right way to go.
The client wants to change the words, so they go into the CMS and
update the new copy. It’s a little bit more work to set up at the
beginning, but it pushes the responsibility for changes on to the
client, while at the same time keeping the client out of trouble for
breaking the layout or the structure of the site.
The client wants to change the look and feel, so they come back to the
designer, who modifies the template pages that the CMS uses. All of a
sudden, every page in the site takes on the new appearance with no re-
work needed on existing pages.
Walter
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Thomas Kimmich wrote:
… as Walter said:
it’s very easy: keep both pieces or waste both. Or before to waste
both, don’t break them into two pieces 
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options