Freeway and Expression Engine

I see that the Softpress website now uses Expression Engine and that there is a suite of Actions.

I need to develop a way of creating websites with a CMS, but I am a graphic designer not a coder. I have used Freeway for a few years now.

Is F+EE for me?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

It depends what you need your CMS to do.

If you just need your client to be able to update the odd section then Pulse might do the trick.

If you need your clients to be able to create new pages etc. them maybe WebYep

Expression Engine is a fully featured CMS that cam take over a whole site and may well be overkill for your needs.

So if you can outline what capabilities you need from the CMS we can point you in the right direction.

David


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Well, immediately I need a site where the client can do simple changes to text and images, add PDF links and video, and maybe add the odd page or two.

But longer term I want to be able to offer more serious CMS sites to customers.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

where the client can do simple changes to text and images, add PDF links and video, and maybe add the odd page or two.

Well Pulse will do that pretty much as will WebYep.

A big factor in the choice is the ability of your client to manage the complexities of the CMS.

And remember that the more you offer the less you are needed! Don’t do yourself out of a job.

D


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

“A big factor in the choice is the ability of your client to manage the complexities of the CMS.”

Good point!

Do you have examples of Pulse or WebYeb sites? Which is the better of the two?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Which is the better of the two?

Very subjective - what do you need them to be able to do?

One might be better for some things while the other…

Visit their sites and have a look

And of course there are many others out there.

This is an area that requires a lot of thought and discussion between you and the client over how much control they want or you want to give them. There is no point in investing in an over featured CMS whose capabilities far exceed those required.

KISS - is the key. Make it too complicated for the client and they will never use it - or bugger your site up.

At the end of the day there is no ‘one size fits all’ CMS.

D


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi Graham,

Agree with Dave all all points, especially with what the client requires and what their ability is to change content.
If the clients site will be multifaceted with several people on the client side involved it might require a more complex and adaptable cms. If on the other hand they just need the odd div to be cms then Pulse (or ao) would probably be fine.

I’m currently working on a 40+ page community site (revamp from their previous site) at the moment and the client wished to have the option to change content (not header or footers) for most of the simple pages themselves (ho hum) so I’ve decided to use Pulse as its very easy to implement and especially easy for the client to get their head around, with a bit of tuition.

Pulse importantly for me also handles (without extra cost) images particularly well, so the client can place them were they wish rather than fixed points, it also has a good and easy to implement gallery option.

However I am looking at other programs for more involved cms sites, weighing up at the moment what to spend my time on studying, perhaps not as complex as EE but something fun to work with.

s


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi Graham,

Here are few more alternatives of varying complexity.

Perch http://grabaperch.com/
MojoMotor http://mojomotor.com/
MODx http://modx.com/ Note: MODx, while full-featured, is geared towards being more designer-friendly than some of the other Big Boy CMS options out there.

Todd
http://www.xiiro.com
Twitter: @XiiroOne
Skype: toddbrilliant


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options