Since I’m aware, that the re-design of http://www.bostonglobe.com opened a new chapter in web design, I’m fascinated of the big monolith “newspaper” at all.
Basically I’m happy, that mine is physically in my postbox, still smelling like printery. I grab em, carry em - the sports part for me, the rest for my wife - I love it.
The next day, we wrap biowaste (is it an english expression?) in it - one day in may life thrown away - expecting the next.
The digital life is perhaps much harder. Being popular each day, but keeping older and interesting things - and if yes, how long? And where archived?
I can’t judge “digital” news at all - I don’t read em. But if - and especially in this list for educational purposes - I always set myself in the position of:
“What happens, if local newspaper runs my door - firing 120 000 US$ (or whatever currency) with the words: We heard you’re the best - expecting results - great results by the way.”
Meee? The biggest hater of blown up pages? The one who hates to be lost after the second or third click in the digital nirvana? It’s damn fair to judge things - but honestly it’s too easy to write some smart comments.
Now that I know theGuardian, watching it twice - and giving it a further chance, I am about to say, that they made things great.
What I specifically like is, that they avoid those “mega-menu flying out because we need everything in the menu bar bullshit”.
And when I click on an article excerpt, it carries me to the expected article (as far as I can see).
Interestingly enough is a new trend, where newspapers, radio-stations or power-blogger consider removing the “comment” function from their articles and posts. I haven’t thought about it yet - but it’s not only caused by “bad comments”.
Cheers
Thomas
offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options