GOod morning,
Overflow question …
why does a site look perfect on Safari? no bleeding over the background no overlapping…
but on Firefox it overflows and overlaps?
And I have a good Amount of extra background incase…
any suggestions to fix this would be great!
http://grassrootsweb.net/jason/
http://grassrootsweb.net/jason/grasschoppersser.html
Julie
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Because you are not using an inline construction method and maybe your default font size in FF is not the same as you are using in Safari.
David
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Refresh my memory … Inline design…
Sent from my iPhone
On May 8, 2013, at 6:56 PM, DeltaDave email@hidden wrote:
Because you are not using an inline construction method and maybe your default font size in FF is not the same as you are using in Safari.
David
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Refresh my memory … Inline design…
Box within a box, CSS Box Model, Inline Construction - take your pick from its many names.
You could try the RPL action - that might work for you.
D
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Box within a box, CSS Box Model, Inline Construction - take your pick from
its many names.
Not CSS Box Model. Never CSS Box Model.
C’mon guys, Thomas already guaranteed me the majority of you understand the
difference between “Box Model” (the unfortunately named and badly-branded
Freeway Pro technique of nesting html divs or “boxes” into each other via
the text-insertion tool to construct a layout) and “CSS Box Model” (the
archetypal web-design principle which describes the process of how a
browser determines the dimensions of absolutely everything as a function of
its content and that content’s padding, border and/or margin settings).
Failing the branding test of clarity, I move the name describing the first
process be changed… how about a contest?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Hi Guys,
uhhh - I guaranteed. Yeah I did.
The simple point is, that the majority of Freeway Users talk about the INPUT - so referring to the Freeway WORKSPACE (WYSIWYG). In this nutshell it could be named however you want as long you put the preface “Freeway” in front and never use it in conjunction with CSS.
The CSS-Box-Model is discussing the OUTPUT, so the generated code and it’s appearance in the web (CASCADING STYLES in a SHEET). And there we are:
Most average Freeway Users never reached that point so far. And those that did can handle the difference between and have therefore no problem with it.
I guarantee further that my subscribers WILL know this difference :-)*
However (and that’s what I wanted to answer you Ernie offline) I decided to open (and close it cause I have no time for further discussions in this) the naming-battle into:
Freeway Box-in-Box ModelPro Version X (short Box-in-Box)
while Julie’s construction here in view will be
Drop-and-Drag ModelExpress/Pro (short Drop’n Drag)
Now it’s up to us to strictly advertise this idea.
Back to Julie’s page:
Yes - david is on the correct track:
To ensure the appearance of a page cross-browser you should either use the Box-in-Box method or if you use the Drag’n Drop method, the RelativePage Layout could help you here. It should be noted that RPL only works if your items on the page DON’T overlap.
Cheers
Thomas
(*) … and to ensure this, I start now producing a couple of new episodes cause we have bank-holiday today in germany - so hurry-up Thomas
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Okay, prepending FREEWAY so the term becomes FREEWAY BOX MODEL seems an
agreeable branding compromise.
Looking forward to more vids Thomas 
–
Ernie Simpson
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Thomas Kimmich email@hidden wrote:
Hi Guys,
uhhh - I guaranteed. Yeah I did.
The simple point is, that the majority of Freeway Users talk about the
INPUT - so referring to the Freeway WORKSPACE (WYSIWYG). In this nutshell
it could be named however you want as long you put the preface “Freeway” in
front and never use it in conjunction with CSS.The CSS-Box-Model is discussing the OUTPUT, so the generated code and it’s
appearance in the web (CASCADING STYLES in a SHEET). And there we are:Most average Freeway Users never reached that point so far. And those that
did can handle the difference between and have therefore no problem with it.I guarantee further that my subscribers WILL know this difference :-)*
However (and that’s what I wanted to answer you Ernie offline) I decided
to open (and close it cause I have no time for further discussions in this)
the naming-battle into:Freeway Box-in-Box ModelPro Version X (short Box-in-Box)
while Julie’s construction here in view will be
Drop-and-Drag ModelExpress/Pro (short Drop’n Drag)
Now it’s up to us to strictly advertise this idea.
Back to Julie’s page:
Yes - david is on the correct track:
To ensure the appearance of a page cross-browser you should either use the
Box-in-Box method or if you use the Drag’n Drop method, the RelativePage
Layout could help you here. It should be noted that RPL only works if your
items on the page DON’T overlap.Cheers
Thomas
(*) … and to ensure this, I start now producing a couple of new episodes
cause we have bank-holiday today in germany - so hurry-up Thomas
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Okay, prepending FREEWAY so the term becomes FREEWAY BOX MODEL seems an agreeable branding compromise.
To be pedantic from the first moment:
Box-in-Box Model
Cheers
Thomas
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Thanks to all!!
J
On May 9, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Thomas Kimmich email@hidden wrote:
Okay, prepending FREEWAY so the term becomes FREEWAY BOX MODEL seems an agreeable branding compromise.
To be pedantic from the first moment:
Box-in-Box Model
Cheers
Thomas
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Not CSS Box Model. Never CSS Box Model.
I only mentioned those terms as ones that might be familiar and recognisable to Julie - not as defining ones!
D
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I suggest we call it simply the “inline method”
On 9 May 2013 23:25, DeltaDave email@hidden wrote:
Not CSS Box Model. Never CSS Box Model.
I only mentioned those terms as ones that might be familiar and
recognisable to Julie - not as defining ones!D
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I suggest that we do what thesps say about mentioning the Scottish Play and simply not mention its name!
Ever again.
D
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I suggest we call it simply the “inline method”
I’ll agree with Glynster. Inline seems to be the best description, as it implies a text-flow.
Dave, _________ _________ and _________ version ___________ headache _________.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options