[Pro] 301 vs. Timed Redirect

Will the SEO Gods punish me if I just do a timed redirect using the page action, instead of doing a 301 redirect?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Yes. They will hate you very much. To the point of ignoring you
completely.

Walter

On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Rich Gannon wrote:

Will the SEO Gods punish me if I just do a timed redirect using the
page action, instead of doing a 301 redirect?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Is there any evidence of that being true? I had a quick look and couldn’t find much, other than someone reporting that if the time until the redirect is short the page you redirect to is indexed, otherwise it’s the page with the redirect that’s indexed. That’s with a client or server redirect. Estimated source reliability? I’d say about 20% :slight_smile:
http://www.internetofficer.com/seo/html-redirect/

Joe

On 27 Jan 2011, at 01:31, Walter Lee Davis wrote:

Yes. They will hate you very much. To the point of ignoring you completely.

Walter

On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Rich Gannon wrote:

Will the SEO Gods punish me if I just do a timed redirect using the page action, instead of doing a 301 redirect?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Nothing empirical, and sorry for passing opinion off as fact.

I really do sincerely believe that it is true, since Google reads Web
pages so quickly, and even a timed redirect of 0 is not as fast as the
DOM load that has to happen before the Meta refresh can happen.
Google’s crawler can read the page while the DOM is loading, after all.

A 301 is honest, forthright, and says clearly – “This page, which
used to be here, is now over there. This is final, permanent, don’t
come back here looking for it.” In my opinion, it’s just the Right
Thing To Do.

Walter

On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Joe Billings wrote:

Is there any evidence of that being true? I had a quick look and
couldn’t find much, other than someone reporting that if the time
until the redirect is short the page you redirect to is indexed,
otherwise it’s the page with the redirect that’s indexed. That’s
with a client or server redirect. Estimated source reliability? I’d
say about 20% :slight_smile:
http://www.internetofficer.com/seo/html-redirect/

Joe

On 27 Jan 2011, at 01:31, Walter Lee Davis wrote:

Yes. They will hate you very much. To the point of ignoring you
completely.

Walter

On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Rich Gannon wrote:

Will the SEO Gods punish me if I just do a timed redirect using
the page action, instead of doing a 301 redirect?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

301 it is. As always big thanks.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options