I think you are trying too hard to position your graphic footer in FWP –
it’s relatively positioned within the item2 container, but you’ve added
some additional positioning that is mucking the browser’s rendering
ability.
Is this an inflow layout? To make it behave again, I set the height of the
item2 container to flexible. Then I removed the following style attributes
for the image #plainfooter -
left: 24px;
top: 897px;
then I implemented the following margin settings for the image…
margin: 30px, 0;
which, of course is css shorthand - something I think FWP still doesn’t do
(?) and is done the long way like so…
margin-top: 30px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
or whatever number suits your fancy. At this point the bottom of your page
begins behaving like a proper page bottom.
Normally I would scold you for your image/imagemap footer, but it seems I
am currently preoccupied with the search for the serenity to accept the
things I cannot change. Don’t worry, it’s probably just a phase.
–
Ernie Simpson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:26 AM, EM email@hidden wrote:
I too am experiencing some odd positioning issues after opening a site
built in FW6 in my upgraded FW7.Specifically, I have a footer (placed within nested HTML) being forced to
the bottom of the page. So it required a lot of extra scrolling of “white
space” to see the footer.I thought this thread was my answer, but no matter what I have tried, I am
not quite understanding what is going on with it!If I simply place the footer as a ‘floating’ element, it appears where I
place it. However, I need it to push down the page as a inline element.This is a simple page, but a good example of what I am experiencing.
http://martingroupid.com/DEV/IOT/survey.html
Thank you in advance for your time and any assistance!
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options