[Pro] Page height-best practice?

What’s the best way to handle pages that expand vertically?

For example, say I have a Master Page that’s 960 x 800, but during the design process several of my pages based on that master need to be taller than 800 pixels.

Should I create a new master page to accommodate the taller height, or simply expand the site page. Or would a flexible page wrapper work better, and if so, where should I place the flexible page wrapper, in the master page or in the site page?

Also, how does all of this factor into master page heights?

Just trying to get a better idea for how I should be designing my sites to take full advantage of the power of master pages.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Do you talk about NOC (Nested Objects Construction) aka BMC (BoxModel Construction)?

So if - the canvas size in Freeway doesn’t matter anymore, cause the height of your page (in Browser) is the sum of the heights of each sections (in Freeway). So set the height of canvas as you like.

I still can’t speak about Master/Child relations cause I do not really use Master pages.

Cheers

Thomas


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Except for mobile devices in my experience. You may have a nice page with footer at the bottom in your browser, but on a mobile the height of the screen doesn’t allow for footers at the bottom, unless your content goes beyond the device screen height.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

So, what’s the consensus on this? My issue has more to do with flexible inline boxes. Should I worry about the boxes falling off the bottom of the page?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

No the inline boxes will push on regardless of your document settings.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Again, the “page” you see in Freeway Pro is not real. It is a canvas that
only means anything in the application. Make it as long as you need,
different each page. It will have no effect on how long the browser window
is. End Of Story.


Ernie Simpson

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:04 AM, RavenManiac email@hidden wrote:

So, what’s the consensus on this? My issue has more to do with flexible
inline boxes. Should I worry about the boxes falling off the bottom of the
page?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Okay, will do. But what about the page-wrapper. Should that be specified as a pixel size or percentage?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

If you’re building an inline (flexible) layout then it should have no defined height. Not “0” but no height value.

Todd

Okay, will do. But what about the page-wrapper. Should that be specified as a pixel size or percentage?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

You mean click it off so the grab handles turn red?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

if you mean the page div that Freeway starts with in the measurements make sure its set (in FW6 inspector) to minimum height - 100%


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Select the div then go to Menu > Item > Fit Box to Content. There used to be a global setting to set an undefined height for all new divs. Maybe it’s still there, I don’t know. The other way is to delete any height value for an element in the Inspector then Tab out so the field is blank.

Todd

You mean click it off so the grab handles turn red?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

I believe in Pro6, no defined width is achieved through use of “Available”
width setting and no defined height is achieved through “Flexible” heading.
( I know, confusing, huh? )

If you’re talking about the Pro6 “page” setting, then Align:None,
Width:Available, Min-Height:100%


Ernie Simpson

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Todd email@hidden wrote:

If you’re building an inline (flexible) layout then it should have no
defined height. Not “0” but no height value.

Todd
http://xiiro.com

Okay, will do. But what about the page-wrapper. Should that be specified
as a pixel size or percentage?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Yes it is. And that’s coming from the guy who once tried reading Simulacra and Simulation.

Todd

( I know, confusing, huh? )


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Well, I would have used different terminology - but that reflects my
comfort with actual html/css terms, and my ling-time belief that FWP
labeling should help users to understand what they are really doing instead
of always forcing us to translate the baby-talk. But that’s just me. :slight_smile:


Ernie Simpson

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Todd email@hidden wrote:

( I know, confusing, huh? )


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Yeah, I agree. It’s like a terminology tug-of-war.

Todd

Well, I would have used different terminology - but that reflects my
comfort with actual html/css terms, and my ling-time belief that FWP
labeling should help users to understand what they are really doing instead
of always forcing us to translate the baby-talk. But that’s just me. :slight_smile:


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

So, if I want to ensure that the whole page is colored without using the Page > Background > Color option can I use an inline wrapper to do that? If so, how do i set that wrapper?

BTW, I’m using FWP 5.5 for this.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Basically, I want to be able to change the page background easily via a master page, but I can’t use the page option because I already have a background image.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

I’m not sure why you aren’t setting the Window background. I think the Page
background targets the first div element.

In either case, you can change the instance background from the master, so
what’s the big deal?


Ernie Simpson

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, RavenManiac email@hidden wrote:

Basically, I want to be able to change the page background easily via a
master page, but I can’t use the page option because I already have a
background image.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options