[Pro] Responsive background image troubles?

Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?

Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?

Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?

Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Freeway’s Inspector palette :

alt text

Having the option Background scrolls checked, results in " no background-positioning".
Unchecking it will add ‘background-position: fixed’ to it’s css. So, set it to scroll and you’re fine.


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Ok Richard, thats clear.

What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Ok Richard, thats clear.

What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Ok Richard, thats clear.

What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Ok Richard, thats clear.

What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Only thing is, you will have to go to the Extended options to apply the background-size:cover value.

  • Select the DIV
  • Hit Cmd-Alt-X
  • Go to
    tab
  • Name: background-size
  • Value: cover
  • OK

Done


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Upside: It saves you 41KB serverspace
Downside: As soon as I trash it, your bg image is gone

:slight_smile:


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Just download it, drag it into your Media folder and apply it as background


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.

One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;

I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.

One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;

I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.

One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;

I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

It is. You can remove that one from the body though …


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

And stop using windows for crying out loud. Or at least stop using Internet Exploder :S


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi Richard,

Well back to Safari 8.0.3. So I am home again.
Much better than explorer. It’s time to change my FW doc now!

Thanks for your help so far!


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Please see the result: www.appadvies.nl


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Looks a lot better, Wim (except for the crappy lowres image) :wink:


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Is the image so bad? I think it looks acceptable on iPad and 13" MacBook. But on your screen…

Ehm, what do you suggest to improve it?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options