Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 12:27pm
21
Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?
Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 12:27pm
22
Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?
Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 12:27pm
23
Thanks Dave!
And Richard:
I do not exactly understand what you mean with body was fixed. Which inspector panel (from page or other…) do you refer to?
Can I put the css you made on the same location as the css I have now in use?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:31pm
24
Freeway’s Inspector palette :
Having the option Background scrolls checked, results in " no background-positioning".
Unchecking it will add ‘background-position: fixed’ to it’s css. So, set it to scroll and you’re fine.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:42pm
25
Ok Richard, thats clear.
What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:42pm
26
Ok Richard, thats clear.
What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:42pm
27
Ok Richard, thats clear.
What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:42pm
28
Ok Richard, thats clear.
What do you think: whats the advantage of your method with having the image on your webspace and the css referring to it instead of using the inspector to add a background image?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:43pm
29
Only thing is, you will have to go to the Extended options to apply the background-size:cover value.
Select the DIV
Hit Cmd-Alt-X
Go to tab
Name: background-size
Value: cover
OK
Done
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:44pm
30
Upside: It saves you 41KB serverspace
Downside: As soon as I trash it, your bg image is gone
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:46pm
31
Just download it, drag it into your Media folder and apply it as background
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:52pm
32
Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.
One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;
I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:52pm
33
Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.
One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;
I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 2:52pm
34
Aha, you just gave me that css as an example, not for ‘real’ use for me in my FW doc. Then I will use the inspector instead.
One thing I find interesting: I now have in page, extended:
name: style
value: background-size cover;
I picked that up in another thread here. Is that the same code for the same result?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:57pm
35
It is. You can remove that one from the body though …
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 2:58pm
36
And stop using windows for crying out loud. Or at least stop using Internet Exploder :S
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 6:14pm
37
Hi Richard,
Well back to Safari 8.0.3. So I am home again.
Much better than explorer. It’s time to change my FW doc now!
Thanks for your help so far!
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 21, 2015, 9:01pm
38
Please see the result: www.appadvies.nl
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Richard
(Richard)
February 21, 2015, 11:57pm
39
Looks a lot better, Wim (except for the crappy lowres image)
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Wimdg
(Wimdg)
February 22, 2015, 12:25pm
40
Is the image so bad? I think it looks acceptable on iPad and 13" MacBook. But on your screen…
Ehm, what do you suggest to improve it?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options