I have long been using the “HTML Language” action to specify page language. Using that action to specify English applies the following code to the page:
html lang=“EN”
But Freeway 5 allows us to specify page language by a popup menu in the Inspector. In such a case, Freeway will generate the following code:
meta http-equiv=Content-Language content=“en”
My question is, which is better to use and why? And is there any reason to use both?
There are arguments for each approach, and both are possible in
Freeway. To apply an attribute (the lang=“la”) to individual items on
the page, select some text and use the Language option in the Style
menu.
I hope this helps.
Joe
On 14 May 2009, at 06:18, JDW wrote:
I have long been using the “HTML Language” action to specify page
language. Using that action to specify English applies the
following code to the page:
html lang=“EN”
But Freeway 5 allows us to specify page language by a popup menu in
the Inspector. In such a case, Freeway will generate the following
code:
meta http-equiv=Content-Language content=“en”
My question is, which is better to use and why? And is there any
reason to use both?