Hi guys,
yep - indeed that’s the one.
And agreed! Printing the unnecessary styles is THE big downside of it at all.
Regarding the ID to class, I wouldn’t judge too hard. I started using it back in version 5+ (spaghetti inline code) and it felt so good simply getting the properties out from there.
And to this time, I was even pretty happy to “rescue” them somewhere (in the head), having the opportunity to either use them external (copy+paste) and/or delete them at all.
Today I don’t check it anymore. Out is out.
What I like as well is the additional class line. This is the timesaver cause I don’t have to go the extended way.
Naturally, we don’t have a perfect world but “the end justifies the meaning” - at least in my little unperfected world.
But I leave no doubt:
In the SuperDIV-action (the one I dream of) ID2class would be one part. And I go one step ahead saying:
I could even think of having this within the inspector.
But you use anonymous, and it will work as well. Cause ID2class IS anonymous - just a lil bit extended. So I wondered why you ask?
Cheers
Thomas
offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at: