LifeHacker is having a vote for best html editor. Freeway didn’t make the cut, but leave a comment and vote “other” here:
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On 5 Jul 2010, at 11:36, cosjr wrote:
LifeHacker is having a vote for best html editor. Freeway didn’t
make the cut, but leave a comment and vote “other” here:
Freeway probably didn’t make the cut because it’s not an HTML editor,
but there you go!
=o)
Heather
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Correction - It is actually best WYSIWYG html editor.
Their five are: Komposer, iWeb, Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Flux.
I’d say Freeway deserves a spot on that list.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I disagree. Freeway is a design tool, a desktop publishing
application. It is most assuredly not an HTML editor. Try opening an
existing HTML page using Freeway and see if you concur…
Walter
On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:20 AM, cosjr wrote:
Correction - It is actually best WYSIWYG html editor.
Their five are: Komposer, iWeb, Dreamweaver, Expression Web and Flux.
I’d say Freeway deserves a spot on that list.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On 5 Jul 2010, at 16:20, cosjr wrote:
I’d say Freeway deserves a spot on that list.
I’m not trying to be argumentative, and I agree Freeway should get a
look-in, but Freeway generates HTML. It doesn’t edit it.
=o)
Heather
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Saying that iWeb got on the list as a HTML editor =:-0
–
David
On 5 Jul 2010, at 15:49, Heather Kavanagh wrote:
Freeway probably didn’t make the cut because it’s not an HTML editor, but there you go!
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I don’t think the author of the article actually means “Editor” in this case - I mean, iWeb is in the list!
Joe
On 5 Jul 2010, at 16:43, Heather Kavanagh wrote:
On 5 Jul 2010, at 16:20, cosjr wrote:
I’d say Freeway deserves a spot on that list.
I’m not trying to be argumentative, and I agree Freeway should get a look-in, but Freeway generates HTML. It doesn’t edit it.
=o)
Heather
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On 5 Jul 2010, at 17:05, Joe Billings wrote:
I don’t think the author of the article actually means “Editor” in
this case - I mean, iWeb is in the list!
Journalists, eh?
rolls eyes
=o)
Heather
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I don’t think the author of the article actually means “Editor” in this case - I mean, iWeb is in the list!
That’s what tipped me off to adding Freeway. I was going to suggest Smultron until I thought about iWeb not being an editor.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Why would Freeway not be considered a WYSIWYG editor? Sure, Freeway produces html, it’s own html. It doesn’t edit external html (unless you edit markup in Freeway) but I would think Freeway is an editor because every WYSIWYG move you make in Freeway is in a sense “editing” the html you will be generating. That’s why I use Freeway. It allows me to visually “edit” what is generated.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:43 AM, cosjr wrote:
Why would Freeway not be considered a WYSIWYG editor?
I understand what you’re saying but by definition an editor is all
about working directly with code; character-by-character/line-by-line
if necessary. Despite the fact that you’re altering the code structure
through a WYSIWYG UI in FW by pushing boxes around you’re still not
allowed to manually edit the code - all the code - which is the key
difference. And using actions or markup items to modify the generated
code is most definitely not the same as working with an editor. If the
app doesn’t allow you to open and edit an html file then it’s simply
not an editor at its most basic level.
Todd
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
It doesn’t look like anyone has mentioned Freeway on there yet! Did you post something cosjr?
Joe
On 5 Jul 2010, at 18:38, Todd wrote:
On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:43 AM, cosjr wrote:
Why would Freeway not be considered a WYSIWYG editor?
I understand what you’re saying but by definition an editor is all about working directly with code; character-by-character/line-by-line if necessary. Despite the fact that you’re altering the code structure through a WYSIWYG UI in FW by pushing boxes around you’re still not allowed to manually edit the code - all the code - which is the key difference. And using actions or markup items to modify the generated code is most definitely not the same as working with an editor. If the app doesn’t allow you to open and edit an html file then it’s simply not an editor at its most basic level.
Todd
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
hmmm . . . don’t know what happened to my comment on LifeHacker. Just did it again. I am an approved commenter.
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options