woorank

I’m just querying the results from woorank. I have performed the reporting on one particular site that I know has a lot of text content and it says that there is only 11% as a ratio.

I also get differing results on other sites - it says “title missing, description missing, keywords missing” but I can see these in the source code.

Has anyone else used Woorank and found these errors and if so, is it a useful tool to use or not?

Nathan Garner

http://www.austinwellsdesign.co.uk

FW5 Pro | MacBook Pro | Snow Leopard


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi Nathan, see my post of the 24th. I’ve not had that problem but Woorank is still “Beta” so I expect it’s making several errors. It tells me several of my sites have frames when they do not. Looking at the code it even picks up on “iFrame” as indicating that the site has frames! Otherwise it does seem to do a tolerable job of pointing up other inadequacies. Any other comments guys?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Ah yes, BETA, I will use it for overall checks rather than being too specific.

Nathan Garner

http://www.austinwellsdesign.co.uk

FW5 Pro | MacBook Pro | Snow Leopard

On 31 Oct 2010, at 08:52, WildCottage wrote:

Hi Nathan, see my post of the 24th. I’ve not had that problem but Woorank is still “Beta” so I expect it’s making several errors. It tells me several of my sites have frames when they do not. Looking at the code it even picks up on “iFrame” as indicating that the site has frames! Otherwise it does seem to do a tolerable job of pointing up other inadequacies. Any other comments guys?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options