Color Management

In an effort to get a firmer grip on color management for print work
I’m finding I need some advice from the more experienced of you. Using
AI (Illustrator) I’m finding that there are a lot of color-related
options available, many of which I don’t fully understand. I realize
there are probably many variables or requirements that determine the
proper color settings from one doc or professional printer to the
next, but - here’s the $64 question - is there a general rule of thumb
that might help narrow some of the options a bit? Perhaps the default
settings are fine, I don’t know. A very broad question, I know, but a
little direction would be of great help.

For example:

Menu > Edit > Color Settings
Settings - North America General Purpose 2 (Is this OK?)
Working Spaces
RGB - Adobe RGB (or sRGB?)
CMYK - US Web Coated (SWOP) v2

Menu > Edit > Assign Profile - Is it preferable to use the Working
profile or one of the defaults or not color manage?

Thanks,

Todd


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

What kind of printing do you intend to do? A CMYK color profile is most beneficial if the kind of printing you will be doing will use process colors (CMYK) in a Litho press. General desktop printing or small run digital printing will work with RGB profiles just fine.

There is often a color shift if you convert from RGB to CMYK or vise a versa so be careful to print a test proof before committing to a final print run in order to judge color correctness. A file created with CMYK profile for example when printed on RGB printer will have a washed out appearance.

Adobe’s sRGB is more or less regarded as the standard for RGB, but Apple’s RGB profile is slightly different and more related to monitor color than print color. US Wed Coated (SWOP) is pretty much generic for CMYK profile also.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Primarily small run digital will be norm though I suppose a Litho job
may pop up now and then.

You mention “Adobe’s sRGB”. In my list of profiles I see sRGB
IEC61966-2.1 and Adobe RGB but not the one you mention. Did you mean
Adobe RGB?

Thanks chuckamuck, that helps.

Todd

On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:14 PM, chuckamuck wrote:

What kind of printing do you intend to do? A CMYK color profile is
most beneficial if the kind of printing you will be doing will use
process colors (CMYK) in a Litho press. General desktop printing or
small run digital printing will work with RGB profiles just fine.

Adobe’s sRGB is more or less regarded as the standard for RGB, but
Apple’s RGB profile is slightly different and more related to
monitor color than print color. US Wed Coated (SWOP) is pretty much
generic for CMYK profile also.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

On 6 Feb 2009, at 15:33, Todd wrote:

You mention “Adobe’s sRGB”. In my list of profiles I see sRGB
IEC61966-2.1 and Adobe RGB but not the one you mention. Did you mean
Adobe RGB?

I think it was a slip of the keyboard.

I’ve sort of adopted Adobe RGB as the base workflow profile for my
print work. I also calibrate my screen(s) with a hardware calibrator
(Pantone Huey Pro in my case) so the software knows what to show me.

I use Adobe RGB as the default colour space for my DSLR, too. Anything
that comes into Photoshop, Illustrator or InDesign without an embedded
profile prompts the software to ask me if I want to leave it, or apply
the default workflow profile. Once everything has the profile
somewhere, it all works pretty seamlessly.

It’s changed so much since I started this game. I don’t think in CMYK
any more, drawing in RGB images and illustrations, CMYK colours,
Pantone spot colours changed to CMYK on the fly, and all flattened to
a known PDF profile at the end.

The hardest part is ensuring everything you use is singing from the
same profile. Once you’ve got that sorted, it’s pretty easy to use.

It’s so much simpler than when I began, darn it, over twenty years ago.

Heather

^-^

http://gallery.me.com/heatherkay#gallery
A growing collection of personal pixels

http://homepage.mac.com/heatherkay/Model%20Photography%20Portfolio/
Scale models I have known

¬_¬


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thanks Heather,

It’s all starting to gel a little bit. I do wonder though, if I’m
given a file with a different (or custom) embedded profile from what
I’m using (say, Adobe RGB) is it always best to change it to my default?

On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Heather Kavanagh wrote:

I use Adobe RGB as the default colour space for my DSLR, too.
Anything that comes into Photoshop, Illustrator or InDesign without
an embedded profile prompts the software to ask me if I want to
leave it, or apply the default workflow profile. Once everything has
the profile somewhere, it all works pretty seamlessl


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

On 6 Feb 2009, at 16:27, Todd wrote:

is it always best to change it to my default

I guess it depends on whether you’re going to be editing the file in
any great way or not.

I will generally convert an incoming image to my preferred profile, I
have to say.

Heather

^-^

http://gallery.me.com/heatherkay#gallery
A growing collection of personal pixels

http://homepage.mac.com/heatherkay/Model%20Photography%20Portfolio/
Scale models I have known

¬_¬


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Adobe RGB (1998) is the best RGB colour space to use for general
work, including scanning, digital photography and image manipulation
and adjustment. It covers a broad part of the visible spectrum, and
can be achieved by decent quality displays. The sRGB standard is more
of a lowest-common-denominator colour space, one that covers the
range of colour that you can reasonably expect to be achievable on
the average bog-standard display - NOT on a high-quality display. (As
I sometimes tell my students, the ‘s’ in sRGB is for ‘standard’, but
there’s another word beginning with ‘s’ that could equally be used.)

My Photoshop image fine-tuning is done in Adobe RGB. Then, because
browsers and browser plugins assume image content is sRGB (and hence
produce particularly dull renderings of content that’s in a broader
RGB colour space) I convert the profile to sRGB in Photoshop. (That’s
Edit > Convert to Profile - NOT Edit > Assign Profile.) This gives me
the best standard colour space for editing and then produces the best
final results in sRGB once I’m done. Of course, when working for
print I don’t convert to sRGB, ever.

Calibration is actual adjustment of the behaviour of a device,
normally a display. The idea is to get the device working as best it
can, then to profile it to measure just how well it performs.

The thing to remember about profiles is that they don’t change your
image content, they just describe the characteristics of the device
they are for…

A monitor profile describes the strengths and weaknesses of that
monitor, and the colour management system adjusts the signal sent to
that display to compensate.

A scanner profile describes the way the scanner’s results match or
don’t match the original, so the colour management system knows what
compensation should be used when dealing with something with that
scanner profile.

A printer profile describes how well or otherwise the printer manages
to do at rendering specific colours, shades and tones, so the colour
management system can take that into account when print data is
compiled and sent to the device.

You can use the profile of one output device to proof something using
a different output device. For example, you can use a (high-quality)
inkjet printer to proof the way work will look on a four-colour
offset litho press. The caveat being that you need accurate profiles
for both, and that if the proofing device can’t quite render the same
tones/hues that the destination device can then the proof will be
limited in those respects.

If you use CS3 or CS4 then select one main app to configure the
colour settings - I suggest Photoshop as it has the widest range of
controls - then save those, go to Adobe Bridge, and pick this as the
suite-wide synchronised colour settings.

I don’t use Adobe’s generic colour settings; they are safe enough,
but certainly not ideal for sheet-fed work on normal coated stock. My
standard settings for regular print work and all photo manipulation,
when I don’t have specific press profiles to work with, are as
follows:

Working Spaces
RGB: Adobe RGB (1998)
CMYK: Coated FOGRA39 (ISO 12647-2:2004)
Gray: Dot Gain 15%
Spot: Dot Gain 15%

Color Management Policies
RGB, CMYK and Gray: all Preserve Embedded Profiles

Description:
“General-purpose colour settings for print. Adobe RGB and FOGRA39”

FOGRA39 is a reasonable fall-back standard for general offset litho
work. It is a recognised European standard and a ratified ISO
standard too. I recommend this over the slightly thin results that
you can get from US Web Coasted (SWOP), the normal defaults. And
whatever you do, don’t use Euroscale - that’s based on inks that
haven’t been manufactured for years!

Remember, RGB colour can be brighter and more saturated than can be
achieved in CMYK, but there are a few parts of the CMYK spectrum
(notably pure 100% cyan) that can’t be precisely rendered in RGB.
Colour conversion from RGB to CMYK should be done only when you know
what standard to use (that’s the FOGRA39, US Web, US Sheetfed, Web
Coated SWOP, etc., or you have a specific press profile). Going from
RGB to CMYK throws away data that you can’t get back, so do your
homework first - even if this means just picking a general standard
that seems appropriate.

You can use an all-RGB workflow and have your colour converted to
CMYK as late as possible in the prepress process. This ensures that
your RGB colours are converted as appropriately as possible, but it
also means that you have taken your hands off the wheel (as it were)
before that all-important point. If you want to match precise CMYK
colour values then you need to produce those yourself. So - in these
cases, when working for print, specify colours in CMYK.

k (done ramblin’)


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

k (done ramblin’)

A digital color seminar in a nutshell. :wink:

Adobe RGB is the generic profile used most often, and probably most reliably. sRGB as Keith points out is lowest common (acceptable?) profile and relates to digital display. I didn’t bring up the calibration issue so as not to muddy the waters, but to accurately (as much as is possible anyway) judge color correctness from monitor to proof calibration is a must.

For CMYK, different areas of the globe standardize on different profiles based on the press and ink in use as Keith has intimated.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

A really outstanding explanation, thank you. Things are getting
clearer all the time.

Questions:

In the Save Adobe PDF dialog there’s a picking list called Standard
with several options like: None, PDF/X-3:2002 etc. I’ve been reading
about some of these but how do you know when to use one instead of the
None option? Is it something that the printer will tell you about if
they require it?

Are there times when a printer will require you to use their own
specific (custom?) profile and send it to you?

Todd

On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Keith Martin wrote:

Adobe RGB (1998) is the best RGB colour space to use for general
work, including scanning, digital photography and image manipulation
and adjustment. It covers a broad part of the visible spectrum, and
can be achieved by decent quality displays. The sRGB standard is
more of a lowest-common-denominator colour space, one that covers
the range of colour that you can reasonably expect to be achievable
on the average bog-standard display - NOT on a high-quality display.
(As I sometimes tell my students, the ‘s’ in sRGB is for ‘standard’,
but there’s another word beginning with ‘s’ that could equally be
used.)

My Photoshop image fine-tuning is done in Adobe RGB. Then, because
browsers and browser plugins assume image content is sRGB (and hence
produce particularly dull renderings of content that’s in a broader
RGB colour space) I convert the profile to sRGB in Photoshop.
(That’s Edit > Convert to Profile - NOT Edit > Assign Profile.) This
gives me the best standard colour space for editing and then
produces the best final results in sRGB once I’m done. Of course,
when working for print I don’t convert to sRGB, ever.

Calibration is actual adjustment of the behaviour of a device,
normally a display. The idea is to get the device working as best it
can, then to profile it to measure just how well it performs.

The thing to remember about profiles is that they don’t change
your image content, they just describe the characteristics of the
device they are for…

A monitor profile describes the strengths and weaknesses of that
monitor, and the colour management system adjusts the signal sent to
that display to compensate.

A scanner profile describes the way the scanner’s results match or
don’t match the original, so the colour management system knows what
compensation should be used when dealing with something with that
scanner profile.

A printer profile describes how well or otherwise the printer
manages to do at rendering specific colours, shades and tones, so
the colour management system can take that into account when print
data is compiled and sent to the device.

You can use the profile of one output device to proof something
using a different output device. For example, you can use a (high-
quality) inkjet printer to proof the way work will look on a four-
colour offset litho press. The caveat being that you need accurate
profiles for both, and that if the proofing device can’t quite
render the same tones/hues that the destination device can then the
proof will be limited in those respects.

If you use CS3 or CS4 then select one main app to configure the
colour settings - I suggest Photoshop as it has the widest range of
controls - then save those, go to Adobe Bridge, and pick this as the
suite-wide synchronised colour settings.

I don’t use Adobe’s generic colour settings; they are safe enough,
but certainly not ideal for sheet-fed work on normal coated stock.
My standard settings for regular print work and all photo
manipulation, when I don’t have specific press profiles to work
with, are as follows:

Working Spaces
RGB: Adobe RGB (1998)
CMYK: Coated FOGRA39 (ISO 12647-2:2004)
Gray: Dot Gain 15%
Spot: Dot Gain 15%

Color Management Policies
RGB, CMYK and Gray: all Preserve Embedded Profiles

Description:
“General-purpose colour settings for print. Adobe RGB and FOGRA39”

FOGRA39 is a reasonable fall-back standard for general offset litho
work. It is a recognised European standard and a ratified ISO
standard too. I recommend this over the slightly thin results that
you can get from US Web Coasted (SWOP), the normal defaults. And
whatever you do, don’t use Euroscale - that’s based on inks that
haven’t been manufactured for years!

Remember, RGB colour can be brighter and more saturated than can be
achieved in CMYK, but there are a few parts of the CMYK spectrum
(notably pure 100% cyan) that can’t be precisely rendered in RGB.
Colour conversion from RGB to CMYK should be done only when you know
what standard to use (that’s the FOGRA39, US Web, US Sheetfed, Web
Coated SWOP, etc., or you have a specific press profile). Going from
RGB to CMYK throws away data that you can’t get back, so do your
homework first - even if this means just picking a general standard
that seems appropriate.

You can use an all-RGB workflow and have your colour converted to
CMYK as late as possible in the prepress process. This ensures that
your RGB colours are converted as appropriately as possible, but it
also means that you have taken your hands off the wheel (as it were)
before that all-important point. If you want to match precise CMYK
colour values then you need to produce those yourself. So - in these
cases, when working for print, specify colours in CMYK.

k (done ramblin’)


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

In the Save Adobe PDF dialog there’s a picking list called Standard
with several options like: None, PDF/X-3:2002 etc. I’ve been reading
about some of these but how do you know when to use one instead of the
None option? Is it something that the printer will tell you about if
they require it?

Best practice is to ask the printer which version of PDF-X they prefer. Makes you look knowledgable too. :wink:

Are there times when a printer will require you to use their own
specific (custom?) profile and send it to you?

That is possible, but you need to ask.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thank you very much chuckamuck, Heather and Keith.

Todd

On Feb 6, 2009, at 2:12 PM, chuckamuck wrote:

In the Save Adobe PDF dialog there’s a picking list called Standard
with several options like: None, PDF/X-3:2002 etc. I’ve been reading
about some of these but how do you know when to use one instead of
the
None option? Is it something that the printer will tell you about if
they require it?

Best practice is to ask the printer which version of PDF-X they
prefer. Makes you look knowledgable too. :wink:

Are there times when a printer will require you to use their own
specific (custom?) profile and send it to you?

That is possible, but you need to ask.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Sometime around 6/2/09 (at 15:12 -0500) chuckamuck said:

Best practice is to ask the printer which version of PDF-X they
prefer. Makes you look knowledgable too. :wink:

That’s true on both counts.

The different PDF/X options aren’t about making special new kinds of
PDF, they are simply the names for sets of established PDF production
standards that the print industry has agreed. Producing a PDF using a
PDF-X standard means that it is absolutely guaranteed to be produced
using an unambiguous list of settings.

From the Creative Suite 3 Integration book:


The PDF/X settings are ISO standards for graphic content exchange.
The PDF/X standard was first established as PDF/X-1 in 1998, but it
took a number of years before the standard became widely accepted.
From 2001 there have been enhancements to the PDF-X standard, but all
versions use relatively early versions of the PDF file format. Even
the PDF/X-4:2007 [[and now PDF/X4 2008]] uses the PDF 1.4 format.
PDF/X isn’t a new form of PDF document, instead it sets out an
important series of benchmark settings that allow documents to be
transferred without requiring further information. PDF/X provides a
prepress-oriented set of standards for PDF documents to meet,
including full embedding of fonts and high-resolution image data,
inclusion of bleed, trim and art-box definitions, embedded
information on trapping, and more. The PDF/X-1 standards convert
colors to the destination color space, set as the CMYK working space
as defined in the Color Settings in the origination program, whereas
the newer PDF-X specifications perform no color conversion at all but
set the declared output intent to the CMYK working space.
If a printer or prepress company asks for a particular PDF-X
standard, this is to ensure that the PDF artwork they receive will be
prepared to a known, output-ready set of standards. This doesn’t
guarantee absolutely no problems during production and it is not the
same thing as preflighting a document before preparing the PDF, but
it does eliminate most of the things that can cause difficulties and
inonsistent output.


And also from that book:

PDF/X-1a:2001
All color is converted to CMYK using the destination profile, and
transparency is flattened at high resolution. The result is a
standards-based PDF that will be handled with confidence by most
prepress operators.
P
DF/X-3:2002
[…] the output intent profile is set to the one defined in the
Color Settings controls but document colors aren’t converted at all.
This allows for color-managed workflows and color spaces other than
CMYK, including spot colors, while still conforming to PDF/X
standards. Transparency is flattened at high resolution.

PDF/X-4:2007
[…] As well as the more flexible approach to color offered by
PDF/X-3, it includes support for transparency and layers in the PDF
document, so the Transparency Flattener is disabled.


Producing to a PDF/X standard this doesn’t guarantee that it will
print perfectly, just like a car’s MOT (UK Ministry of Transport
roadworthiness) test certificate doesn’t mean the engine isn’t
clapped out. But it can certainly help avoid the majority of
pitfalls, and preflighting will help avoid most of the rest.

Are there times when a printer will require you to use their own
specific (custom?) profile and send it to you?

Perhaps. As Chuckamuck says, ask.

Realistically speaking, a well-run press should be adjusted
(calibrated) to print pretty precisely and to basic standards, so
printing on a standard stock will produce results that fall within
certain tight parameters. But it is still not a bad idea at all to
use a profile if it is available. Not least because different paper
stock will produce different kinds of results - so a profile for a
particular press on a particular stock will get your colour
management system on board and helping to keep things on track right
through to the final print.

(BTW, if you make and rely on profiles for an inkjet printer it is
important to make profiles for each different kind of paper stock you
use, and to do it again if you change your ink cartridge brand.
Either of these things will affect the output, rendering previous
profiles inaccurate.)

k


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Tremendous information Keith, thanks.

That explains the sometimes large inconsistencies I’ve seen when using
different stock. Surprising how the output can vary so greatly. Well,
surprising to me.
; )

Todd

On Feb 6, 2009, at 5:57 PM, Keith Martin wrote:

(BTW, if you make and rely on profiles for an inkjet printer it is
important to make profiles for each different kind of paper stock
you use, and to do it again if you change your ink cartridge brand.
Either of these things will affect the output, rendering previous
profiles inaccurate.)


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Is the “X” in PDF/X pronounced “ex” or is it the Roman numeral “10”
like OS X?

T.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Is the “X” in PDF/X pronounced “ex” or

Or X as in kiss? :wink: No, it is “ex” as in “Pee Dee Eff Ex”.

k


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Many printers still ask for PDF/X-1a:2001 - or convert to this, because of issues with transparency

On 6 Feb 2009, at 11:57 pm, Keith Martin wrote:

PDF/X-1a:2001

All color is converted to CMYK using the destination profile, and transparency is flattened at high resolution. The result is a standards-based PDF that will be handled with confidence by most prepress operators.

David Owen ::
Freeway Friendly Web Hosting and Domains
http://www.ineedwebhosting.co.uk