I’m start this new thread for anyone to chip in with techniques on optimising Freeway websites to appear on smaller mobile devices using CSS Media Queries for mobile Devices
Rather than serving a completely different mobile website duplicating content and all the problems that can cause.
Drawback with that is that (I believe) a style sheet is created for every for every page.
I know i’m making work (lots of it) for me here. I think its worth exploring the possibilities to extend the skill set.
Anyone please feel free to chip in to add to this thread with any questions ~ it’s not so much help for me but to act a resource for others too.
For anyone interest I’ve added this before
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/mobile.css" media="handheld, screen and (max-device-width: 480px)" type="text/css" />
~~~~
And added an extra stylesheet file mobile.css
David
On 17 Jan 2011, at 16:26, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> Tim Plumb's Externali(s|z)e Action.
_______________________________________________
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Aha . . . yep, that’s what you said from the beginning Well, I guess I’m glad that I looked on the iPad first so that I was able to see the difference, namely that the photo I saw on the iPad wasn’t on the iPhone Safari page – assuming it was supposed to be. Other than that, the gestures worked fine.
Martin
On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:42 AM, David Owen wrote:
Hi Martin,
You need to look on a small screen (iPod / iPhone ) to see the different page. On the iPad you will be seeing the “desktop” version.
–
David
On 17 Jan 2011, at 16:29, Martin Rice wrote:
Looked great on my iPad. Double-tapped it and it filled the screen just right. Expanding and pinching with two fingers worked just right, too.
The reason for this is mobile user don’t always want to see or want to download all the prettiness and bloated image files of a desktop version. They just want to get to the content.
–
David
On 17 Jan 2011, at 17:01, Martin Rice wrote:
Well, I guess I’m glad that I looked on the iPad first so that I was able to see the difference, namely that the photo I saw on the iPad wasn’t on the iPhone Safari page – assuming it was supposed to be.