Just seeing this (sips coffee – late night).
I know that there have been some “auction” models run at this problem,
and the consensus has been that they devalue the individual effort,
and devolve toward a very mean fee. I don’t know whether you were
thinking of going that direction, but there have been some notable
flame-outs in that arena so I wouldn’t encourage it.
Another approach to think about would be the traditional Artist’s
Representative. (I used to be a commercial photographer, and I had two
reps at different times, and knew countless others.) The rep takes a
percentage cut of the fee, some negotiate for a bite of the expenses
mark-up, naturally that wouldn’t be a big thing in a traditional Web
market.
A reputable Rep will avoid conflicts in their stable. I used to shoot
tabletop – food, conceptual still-life, occasionally medium and large
sets with actors – and I was the only artist my rep had who did that
sort of thing. So I never felt like one of the other shooters was
getting “my” work when my rep called on a potential client; after all
I wasn’t shooting cars or architectural interiors or going on location
much.
Reps encourage you to mark your fee up to cover their percentage, and
most artists who use them do this. But since not all artists use reps
(particularly not these days) the decision-by-price tends to
discourage this model as well, since a leaner-and-meaner operation can
undercut their fee, since it doesn’t have to be split so many ways.
With the world economy in a recession, anything that adds (perceived
or real) cost to a service is going to discourage use, from both sides
of that middle-man. Now if the middle-man has a steady supply of work,
and can help the artist get out of the boom-bust-
(omygodIbettercallsomeclients)-boom cycle, then there’s a real
economic benefit to be had here, even if the fee isn’t inflated to
cover the rep’s percentage. 75% of working-all-the-time beats the hell
out of 100% of working-half-the-time.
All just random thoughts.
What model were you thinking of here?
Walter
On Jun 5, 2009, at 6:14 AM, David Owen wrote:
I came across a useful domain name the other day.
http://www.webdesignquote.me/
And was intending to use it myself to drum up business. But I feel
it might be better used as a web designer community in some way.
There are a prethora of (poorly designed) middlemen websites
intercepting quotes from clients and then charging too much for so
called qualified leads. I have even tried to test a few but not
happy with the way it is done.
So I am interested in some feedback from the group as to what would
you like to see from a site that promotes web designers so they can
receive enquiries from interested parties.
A site done properly should get good Google listings worldwide for
“web design quote”.
At this point I won’t mention the model I had in mind, so I am open
to ideas how it could be run.
Any takers to comment favourably? Or shoot the idea down? No
matter, the more views the better.
David
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options