New site

I think if you’re going to push yourself as knowledgable on SEO the site code should really reflect this.

There are very obvious errors with the site regards SEO and page content structure. I talking h1, h2 etc.

Try adding your SEO page to this…

http://www.w3.org/2003/12/semantic-extractor.html

It will give you a feel of how little the page can be understood. Compare with other site page URLs.

Turn off all styles and images in your browser (or in Freeway) and ask yourself honestly if your text explains the page sufficiently to a person who knows nothing about you.

On a real note saying you’re an expert in an area you’re not just might you cause more trouble than its worth.
I believe our US neighbours are more litigious than us Brits, I’d hate a client to cause you trouble. I suppose if the SEO work is to be handed out to a SEO supplier then it’s fair game.

…Also the “cheeper” on your cards page.

David

On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:45, Julie Maxwell Allen email@hidden wrote:

I would love to hear your thoughts!


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

960 px seems like “safe” viewing width to me. I am increasingly tempted to
develop some sites for wider viewers, but I’d still keep 960 as an
important viewpoint to maintain.


Ernie Simpson

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:42 PM, seoras email@hidden wrote:

960? 1060?

980px is what I aim for but it depends on the content to a large degree. I
often have too add padding to reduce the text line length if its just going
to be a single column.

Have a look at other sites to decide.

Personally I find your design a bit bland/insipid with so much white, give
it a little colour and/or texture at least. Emphasized by the over
elaborate (all singing and dancing) carousel. Also, can’t quite get over
that the ‘grass’ is in the header, fixed footer might be more appropriate
or get rid, let the name speak.

Just my bawbee’s worth :wink: 2c ha !

s


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

On 10 Feb 2013, 10:01 pm, The Big Erns wrote:

960 px seems like “safe” viewing width to me. I am increasingly tempted to
develop some sites for wider viewers, but I’d still keep 960 as an
important viewpoint to maintain.

Ernie Simpson

I agree. The temptation is there, but that’s primarily because I have larger monitors. As of now, I tend to stick with 960px. However, I am intrigued by Thomas’s screencasts, which suggest 980px might be a little better. Have you subscribed to that theory Ernie?


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Good points!
thank you…

I have a friend that does SEO so the work would be theres - but thank you for pointing me in the right area to fix mine…

Julie
On Feb 10, 2013, at 5:56 PM, David Owen email@hidden wrote:

I think if you’re going to push yourself as knowledgable on SEO the site code should really reflect this.

There are very obvious errors with the site regards SEO and page content structure. I talking h1, h2 etc.

Try adding your SEO page to this…

Decommission Semantic Data Extractor

It will give you a feel of how little the page can be understood. Compare with other site page URLs.

Turn off all styles and images in your browser (or in Freeway) and ask yourself honestly if your text explains the page sufficiently to a person who knows nothing about you.

On a real note saying you’re an expert in an area you’re not just might you cause more trouble than its worth.
I believe our US neighbours are more litigious than us Brits, I’d hate a client to cause you trouble. I suppose if the SEO work is to be handed out to a SEO supplier then it’s fair game.

…Also the “cheeper” on your cards page.

David
http://www.printlineadvertising.co.uk

On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:45, Julie Maxwell Allen email@hidden wrote:

I would love to hear your thoughts!


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options