On 25 Oct. 2007, 12:21 pm, diarbyrag wrote:
Sorry, must add my two penneth. After all the hard work that’s gone into this, I am genuinely sorry to say, who decided that a 6” strip down the middle was a good idea?
On my 22” wide screen I’ve nearly 13” of blank screen! Sorry but to read this though Safari 2 is a nightmare!
K.
Hey kryten I think the width of your monitor is the least of your problems, if everybody presses ‘quote all’ you will need a monitor about ten feet deep.
Sorry Walter, I’m sure this works fine for the email subscribers but the web version needs some work - at least for me. I really don’t like it
I definitely preferred the forum, it might be ‘optimum readability’ but by the time you work out what is new content inbetween repeat after repeated quotes I just lose the thread.
Gary
There are naturally some teething pains to be expected here, and your comments are an important part of making the forum side of things as forum-like as it can be, given the constraints of a mail-backed system.
I have been on many boards where the expected practice is to not quote, or to quote very lightly. The expectation is that you will read a thread in order to pick up that context.
Would it be better if the quotes just didn’t show on the Web?
What I fear is that without the reminder that they are necessary, we would fall into the black hole of posts that arrive without any sort of context (in an e-mail in-box). And anything that requires a trip back to the Web has missed the entire point, from the mail perspective.
I can’t build an artificial intelligence to determine how much to auto-quote, but you can edit the quotes to your heart’s content before you send your reply. So if you fear what Quote All would do on a “tall” thread, perhaps you might want to scroll through there and delete a few lines from the preceding commentary.