Recently Opera published a study of W3 validation. iWeb produced the best code but Freeway was totally missing.
Any thoughts?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Recently Opera published a study of W3 validation. iWeb produced the best code but Freeway was totally missing.
Any thoughts?
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Ah, forgot the link:
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-key-findings/
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-w3c-validator-research-2/
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
It would be interesting to know how Freeway did by this, but as RapidWeaver isn’t there either I guess they have to set limits. I note Microsoft Word is as good as PageMill by this rating, which I can’t quite believe!
Graham
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:47:52 -0400, MacFinn wrote:
Ah, forgot the link:
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-key-findings/http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-w3c-validator-research-2/
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options