[Pro] End of Freeway

Likely, but if it works on Sierra, that means you have a year to track down a replacement. You obviously no guarantees that it will work after that.

Some will say that you should probably be cautious about updating your work machine, buyt other apps move on with Apple, and you’ll be wanting to keep up with those too.

The suggestion to make a virtual machine with an Apple OS that works with FW 7 has been mentioned many times before, or keep an older machine around with Freeway on just in case.

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves on. What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the next big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7 be able to do that?

We have to be prepared to see a Freeway-free future, unless it really is rescued and revitalised.

On 6 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm, max wrote:

I have been testing FW7 on sierra and everything seems to work correctly so I would say that if thats the case and the final release of the next OSX comes is similar then I would hazard a guess that we have a few years at least… not just months.

max


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options

For anyone who’s interested in an alternative for FW Pro:

after questioning Cazoobi LTD, manufacturer of Blocs, will offer you a

15% discount for Freeway users, for a limited time.
See: http://blocsapp.com/

Send a mail to email@hidden , mention their offer and you will
receive a one-time, non transmissible individual discount code when
purchasing Blocsapp.

Blocs is update to Version 2.2. and has now also several options for CMS
included.

Andries

2016-09-12 11:05 GMT+02:00 Paul email@hidden:

Likely, but if it works on Sierra, that means you have a year to track
down a replacement. You obviously no guarantees that it will work after
that.

Some will say that you should probably be cautious about updating your
work machine, buyt other apps move on with Apple, and you’ll be wanting to
keep up with those too.

The suggestion to make a virtual machine with an Apple OS that works with
FW 7 has been mentioned many times before, or keep an older machine around
with Freeway on just in case.

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves on.
What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the next
big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7 be
able to do that?

We have to be prepared to see a Freeway-free future, unless it really is
rescued and revitalised.

On 6 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm, max wrote:

I have been testing FW7 on sierra and everything seems to work
correctly so I would say that if thats the case and the final release of
the next OSX comes is similar then I would hazard a guess that we have a
few years at least… not just months.

max


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
Information for existing FreewayTalk / Groups.io users - Site Feedback - Softpress Talk


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options

If the mailadress should get obfuscated…

support at blocsapp dot com…

better written down this way?

Andries

2016-09-12 13:38 GMT+02:00 email@hidden:

For anyone who’s interested in an alternative for FW Pro:

after questioning Cazoobi LTD, manufacturer of Blocs, will offer you a

15% discount for Freeway users, for a limited time.
See: http://blocsapp.com/

Send a mail to email@hidden , mention their offer and you will
receive a one-time, non transmissible individual discount code when
purchasing Blocsapp.

Blocs is update to Version 2.2. and has now also several options for CMS
included.

Andries

2016-09-12 11:05 GMT+02:00 Paul email@hidden:

Likely, but if it works on Sierra, that means you have a year to track
down a replacement. You obviously no guarantees that it will work after
that.

Some will say that you should probably be cautious about updating your
work machine, buyt other apps move on with Apple, and you’ll be wanting to
keep up with those too.

The suggestion to make a virtual machine with an Apple OS that works with
FW 7 has been mentioned many times before, or keep an older machine around
with Freeway on just in case.

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves on.
What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the next
big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7 be
able to do that?

We have to be prepared to see a Freeway-free future, unless it really is
rescued and revitalised.

On 6 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm, max wrote:

I have been testing FW7 on sierra and everything seems to work
correctly so I would say that if thats the case and the final release of
the next OSX comes is similar then I would hazard a guess that we have a
few years at least… not just months.

max


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
Information for existing FreewayTalk / Groups.io users - Site Feedback - Softpress Talk


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options

The trick to get around the formatter here is to replace the @ with (a). That gets you out of the email @ address replacement, as well as leaves it as a fully clickable mailto link.

Walter

On Sep 12, 2016, at 12:38 PM, email@hidden wrote:

If the mailadress should get obfuscated…

support at blocsapp dot com…

better written down this way?

Andries

2016-09-12 13:38 GMT+02:00 email@hidden:

For anyone who’s interested in an alternative for FW Pro:

after questioning Cazoobi LTD, manufacturer of Blocs, will offer you a

15% discount for Freeway users, for a limited time.
See: http://blocsapp.com/

Send a mail to email@hidden , mention their offer and you will
receive a one-time, non transmissible individual discount code when
purchasing Blocsapp.

Blocs is update to Version 2.2. and has now also several options for CMS
included.

Andries

2016-09-12 11:05 GMT+02:00 Paul email@hidden:

Likely, but if it works on Sierra, that means you have a year to track
down a replacement. You obviously no guarantees that it will work after
that.

Some will say that you should probably be cautious about updating your
work machine, buyt other apps move on with Apple, and you’ll be wanting to
keep up with those too.

The suggestion to make a virtual machine with an Apple OS that works with
FW 7 has been mentioned many times before, or keep an older machine around
with Freeway on just in case.

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves on.
What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the next
big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7 be
able to do that?

We have to be prepared to see a Freeway-free future, unless it really is
rescued and revitalised.

On 6 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm, max wrote:

I have been testing FW7 on sierra and everything seems to work
correctly so I would say that if thats the case and the final release of
the next OSX comes is similar then I would hazard a guess that we have a
few years at least… not just months.

max


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
Information for existing FreewayTalk / Groups.io users - Site Feedback - Softpress Talk


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
Information for existing FreewayTalk / Groups.io users - Site Feedback - Softpress Talk


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves on. What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the next big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7 be able to do that?

If this would have been written back in 2011/2012 I would have had agreed in all points.

Fact is, that parts of us started to do “current standards” back in tose days. Unfortunately we never had the chance to discuss it, enhance ours or the audience skills because none ever asked for. Instead we fucking discussed “positioning” and “layer hide/show” way too long.

So the precise term is:

This audience become irrelevant, not the app! And this audience won’t survive in any alternative application.

Cheers

Thomas


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options

Thanks Walter for your welcome tip!

2016-09-12 23:21 GMT+02:00 Thomas Kimmich email@hidden:

Also, Freeway 7 will become more and more irrelevant as the Web moves
on. What clients want now can be delivered by Freeway, but what about the
next big thing after we’ve all done our responsive duties? Will Freeway 7
be able to do that?

If this would have been written back in 2011/2012 I would have had agreed
in all points.

Fact is, that parts of us started to do “current standards” back in tose
days. Unfortunately we never had the chance to discuss it, enhance ours or
the audience skills because none ever asked for. Instead we fucking
discussed “positioning” and “layer hide/show” way too long.

So the precise term is:

This audience become irrelevant, not the app! And this audience won’t
survive in any alternative application.

Cheers

Thomas


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
Information for existing FreewayTalk / Groups.io users - Site Feedback - Softpress Talk


freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options