Forgive my total ignorance. I came across a thread with an example of a site using CCS Menu. The menu at "hamburger size " shows the main menu headings - and to my amazement shows the submenu on hover.
All my sites to date done in FW don’t do this - my link here is just one example (Viscounts Restaurant) - I thought this was how the menu should show - i.e.: the Main menu item and the sub menu under (in a different) colour. but all showing one under the other.
This is the site that made me question - What on earth have I missed?
You would see the Hamburger sub 480 px on yours but the #Pagewrapper is set at approx 1200px at that BP - hence the hamburger is off page to the right.
No Pink areas showing on FW preview. At the smaller breakpoints - the menu item “Machinery Stock” has a number of sub menu items. On the standard desktop screen mode the sub menu items appear as normal but at hamburger size the submenu items are all viewing under the Main Menu heading whereas in this example
(at hamburger size) has the submenu items hidden and these are revealed when the main menu item is touched/clicked. This is what I am trying to achieve.
Ah - Good I thought all my menus were wrong.- but it is a very tidy feature as it cuts down on a lot of wording visible!
Is this the code from that site or your own (colours different I believe) and, is it possible or allowable use the feature - if so where is the code placed?
I’d love to be able to implement this function in my menu, the existing CSS Menu action is frustrating in it’s treatment of responsive hamburger sub menus, but after hours of pouring over the code I just can’t figure out where to start in getting this to work! Any pointers to get me started would be gratefully received.
I’d love to be able to implement this function in my menu, the existing CSS Menu action is frustrating in it’s treatment of responsive hamburger sub menus, but after hours of pouring over the code I just can’t figure out where to start in getting this to work! Any pointers to get me started would be gratefully received.
Thanks
Dave
Hi DD stand down on this one as I’ve worked out a similar solution based an example of Richard’s I found on here.