Although the marquee
element is a pariah in the code community, I must point out that it is very well supported by all the modern (and unmodern) browsers AND by Freeway. In its defense, it is an actual html element as opposed to some half-crazed scripted concoction.
Not long ago, I started writing about different ways to implement the marquee element in Freeway, then was distracted by some problem I encountered with underlined spans in links that were specifically styled with no underlines, then realized it was just the stupid marquee element and that there was likely no person on the planet who would appreciate all the work and effort required to show code-a-phobics how to legitimately make their web page look like something from the 90’s.
There are enough online discussions of the marquee element to work out the attributes and options. You can apply it in Freeway as a Tag style-- which just uses the default settings-- or use my modified version of Walter’s HTML5 action to turn html items into containers and add the attributes in the Extended item options. This method can make almost anything dance around the screen in a 20th century way.
###The unfinished article, as is…
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27331610/cssway/marquee-element/index.html
###The modified action, as is…
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27331610/FWT/HTML5-big-erns-modified-action.zip
##Wait, I’m not finished typing just yet.
About the same time I was also writing about the picture
element, a much cooler thing to talk about (again, to the five people who already know of it’s existence and do not require my help in implementing it anywhere in this life. Here is that unfinished article…
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27331610/cssway/picture-element/index.html
--lots of deleted ranting, not sure if it was very therapeutic. Whatever.--
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
https://freewaytalk.softpress.com/person/options