Working at 100% magnification, drawing a small rectangle, the STROKE outline appears on 4 sides as expected. Enlarge the rectangle and the bottom side STROKE disappears. Increasing the line width and the STROKE reappears. Increase the magnification to 200%, the stroke reappears. IS it possible to draw a fine outline at 100% ? Version 3.4.2, 10.6.8.
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
I can’t reproduce this with version 3.5.3, try the demo and if that works for you upgrade.
My understanding, which may be wrong, is that v3.5+ uses the Cocoa (Quartz) drawing frameworks, whereas version 3.4 and earlier use the Carbon (Quickdraw) frameworks. Quartz is much better at handling modern hi-resolution displays and graphics.
C.
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Thanks.
On Oct 12, 2014, at 3:34 PM, cdhw wrote:
I can’t reproduce this with version 3.5.3, try the demo and if that works for you upgrade.
My understanding, which may be wrong, is that v3.5+ uses the Cocoa (Quartz) drawing frameworks, whereas version 3.4 and earlier use the Carbon (Quickdraw) frameworks. Quartz is much better at handling modern hi-resolution displays and graphics.
C.
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
What makes you think Intaglio3.4 and earlier don´t uses Quartz-Engine? I use Intaglio since 2006 and it uses Quartz/CoreImage all the time.
@ df cardwell. Sounds like a graphics board driver/draw bug.
http://postimg.org/image/6luxero5v/
Cheers
Frank
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On 13 Oct 2014, 8:50 am, Frank wrote:
What makes you think Intaglio3.4 and earlier don´t uses Quartz-Engine? I use Intaglio since 2006 and it uses Quartz/CoreImage all the time.
I did say ‘I may be wrong’ 
I am fairly confident that 3.5 marked the transition from Carbon to the an all-Cocoa framework and 64-bit code throughout. It is certainly possible to use 32 bit Quartz from within a Carbon application.
I think that my advice, to see if the upgrade from 3.4 to 3.5 fixes this issue is valid independent of these details. Not least because it is easy and free to try the experiment.
C.
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
On 13 Oct 2014, 10:27 pm, cdhw wrote:
Not least because it is easy and free to try the experiment.C.
Not for me - as Im´ still rely on SL.
What´s new and improved is written down here - so no guessing:
Version 3.5.3
Miscellaneous bug fixes.
Version 3.5
64-bit code optimized for (and requires) Mac OS X 10.8 and later.
64-bit precision in vector coordinates.
Full retina display support.
Updated user interface optimized for the current Mac OS X.
Full-screen user interface support.
Improved text engine.
Updated AppleScript engine.
Autosave and multiple file versions.
Create multiple templates for new drawings.
Flow text into arbitrary shapes including multiple columns.
Improved support for superscripts and subscripts.
Direct menu access for text ligatures and writing direction.
Allows fractions to be entered for dimensions.
Optional interactive geometric feedback tracks mouse.
Portuguese (Brazilian) localization.
Improved Adobe Illustrator import.
Miscellaneous bug fixes and improvements.
Intaglio mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options