I have a question: when I use the codes from google to link pages to google+, my site jumps from 0 errors, 0 warnings in WC3 up to 47 errors, 24 warning. (FB and Linkedin isn’t that much but the create errors too.) Crazy, isn’t it?
Now the question: how important is it to have a zero error page on WC3?
Can you post a link to the page in question? (The one with the errors.) There are errors and there are errors, but on the whole you should strive for error-free, because it makes the page unambiguous to the browser. Browsers have enough differences between them at low levels that if you present them with a broken page, they will each find a different way to auto-correct it before showing it to a visitor. This can lead to impossible-to-diagnose differences in how your page is seen.
Walter
On May 23, 2013, at 1:38 AM, GTPeter wrote:
I have a question: when I use the codes from google to link pages to google+, my site jumps from 0 errors, 0 warnings in WC3 up to 47 errors, 24 warning. (FB and Linkedin isn’t that much but the create errors too.) Crazy, isn’t it?
Now the question: how important is it to have a zero error page on WC3?
Walt thank you. I made a few tests. Many actions produce many errors and warnings (HTML 5). When I do not use the actions, the pages have 0 errors. And yes, it has an impact on the seo-listing. Googles own codes (!!) to tie in a webpage to Google+ results in 54 errors.
-The facebook action
-The google action
-Meta action (no entrys only activated cause HTML 5 has other meta tags.
-The anti spam action etc.
A typical warning is: Line 5, Column 30: The language attribute on the script element is obsolete. You can safely omit it.
At the moment I dont see the point. How can this be solved? There is not much I can do, right?
_______________________________________________
freewaytalk mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options
Yes, I do. It’s just that some errors are critical – not closing a tag in order, inserting a block-level tag in a span-level tag – these have real structural and rendering blowback, because the browser is forced to guess what you meant, and has only a 50% chance of getting it right. On the other hand, extra made-up tag attributes aren’t going to hurt anything, because browsers are designed to ignore them entirely if they don’t understand them.
Walter
On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:12 PM, GTPeter wrote:
Thats clear, Walter, as I said: warnings. They don’t bother me. But…
When I use Anti Spam, plus 1 error and 1 warning
Error Line 4, Column 84: Bad value no-email-collection for attribute name on element meta: Keyword no-email-collection is not registered.