WebYep

Is using a rich text editor (FCK or Tiny) the only way to add video
content using WY? I would prefer not to use one of these if possible.

Todd


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

I don’t have the time to try this at the moment, but what happens if you put a jpeg format video in a WY image object?


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hmm, what about trying one of the Lightbox derivatives that work with video the same way they work with images? Maybe WebYep can be fooled?


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi,

I haven’t tried your jpg suggestion yet but I will. Speaking of Lightbox, has anyone used Slimbox (Mootools Suite) with WebYep applied images?

Todd

On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:57 PM, chuckamuck wrote:

Hmm, what about trying one of the Lightbox derivatives that work with video the same way they work with images? Maybe WebYep can be fooled?

Speaking of
Lightbox, has anyone used Slimbox (Mootools Suite) with WebYep
applied images?

I haven’t, and seeing as how the action inserts the javascript into the page and not the webyep system folder, doubt it will.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi Todd the mootools light-box version (slimbox) wont work though I have ask if this could be a possible future inclusion and as far as video goes at the moment I think if you try to upload a video up using a normal image action it will fail.
though it is possible using TinyMCE and the image manager plug-in.

max


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thanks Max, that’s what I thought but I figured I would ask anyway. I would prefer to avoid using a rich text editor for the movie so I think I’ll stick with FW for that aspect.

Todd

On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:07 PM, max wrote:

the mootools light-box version (slimbox) wont work though I have ask if this could be a possible future inclusion and as far as video goes at the moment I think if you try to upload a video up using a normal image action it will fail.

though it is possible using TinyMCE and the image manager plug-in.

OK - Dumb question I know but I am struggling with a simple task.

I have a WY 4 Image box in a loop and I just want to style the image box border 1px solid #ED7A00

Tried with css etc and getting nowhere - obviously just doing it wrong.

Help please.

David


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Hi david
To do this it’s is easier to place an webyep image item in a html box style the box and then place that in a loop.
max


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

hi Max

Yes that is what I have done

I have WY image, short text and rich text in a loop within an HTML box

David


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

You could add the style in the “Enable arbitrary attributes” box in the WebYep action panel. e.g.

style=“margin-bottom: 10px ; margin-left: 10px ; float:right ; border:solid #D7D7D7 5px”

David

On 13 Sep 2008, at 12:53 pm, DeltaDave wrote:

I have a WY 4 Image box in a loop and I just want to style the image box border 1px solid #ED7A00

David Owen ::
Freeway Friendly Web Hosting and Domains
http://www.ineedwebhosting.co.uk

Give the image box a class, and apply the border using a tag-only style.

div.myclass { border: 5px solid #d7d7d7; }

Walter


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Walter,

I’m not sure its as simple as that with a WebYep image action, especially images in loops. Hence the image style applied in the actions palette.

Perhaps Max could chip in.

David

On 14 Sep 2008, at 6:52 pm, waltd wrote:

Give the image box a class, and apply the border using a tag-only style.

div.myclass { border: 5px solid #d7d7d7; }

Walter

David Owen ::
Freeway Friendly Web Hosting and Domains
http://www.ineedwebhosting.co.uk

The way I normally do this is:
Draw an html box to the size I want then add my styling like borders margins drop shadows etc Then I click inside so I have a flashing curser and then insert my webyep image expand it to fill this outer html box
Then I copy the whole thing and place the lot as an in line then I can float it left or right etc. The reason I do it this way is not only does this allow me to use effect like drop shadows but I also get some sort of visual feedback about how things are panning out when it comes to floats.
You can use the arbitrary attributes area but this wont actually help much when you are trying to do things like visual effect.

This sort of problem is on my to do list… so soon (I hope) these sort of problems will be a distant memory

max


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Thanks to you all for your suggestions.

I tried Max’s method first but what I should have told you is that the pictures in the loop are not all the same size and because of this the border doesn’t ‘cling’ (technical term) to the picture bounds.

David - your method was next and though I had tried this already I obviously didn’t have the syntax correct but using

style="border:1px solid #663300"

I got the result I was after - thanks.

Walter I had tried various permutations of applying a class but I just couldn’t get it to work in the loop and as the other guys have suggested I think that this instance is one where the normal rules don’t apply.

…But I may not have been doing it right!!!

Thanks again

David


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

One of the main problems this method, is the photo has to be used in WebYep otherwise all you see is a collapsed div with the styling.

By styling the webyep picture itself, the WepYep editor does not worry if the picture is not used, as the styling is only visible when there is picture content.

On 14 Sep 2008, at 20:51, max wrote:

The way I normally do this is:
Draw an html box to the size I want then add my styling like borders margins drop shadows etc Then I click inside so I have a flashing curser and then insert my webyep image expand it to fill this outer html box
Then I copy the whole thing and place the lot as an in line then I can float it left or right etc. The reason I do it this way is not only does this allow me to use effect like drop shadows but I also get some sort of visual feedback about how things are panning out when it comes to floats.
You can use the arbitrary attributes area but this wont actually help much when you are trying to do things like visual effect.

This sort of problem is on my to do list… so soon (I hope) these sort of problems will be a distant memory

max

David Owen

http://www.ineedwebhosting.co.uk

If you find yourself in a similar situation again, one thing to do is
look at the generated page using Xyle scope (http://culturedcode.com)
and see what rule(s) are applying to each element. Often you will
discover that what you thought was a really precise rule to attach to
an element is being overridden by another rule elsewhere.

Also, if you want a border to “shrink-wrap” to an image, you can try
applying the border to the image itself, or you can try floating its
container.

 .someclass img {
     border: 1px solid #333;
 }

That rule attaches to an image inside an element with the classname
‘someclass’, and applies a border to the image itself.

The float trick will only work if the image is an inline. Unless told
otherwise, floated elements collapse to the width of their longest
child element.

Walter

On Sep 14, 2008, at 9:00 PM, DeltaDave wrote:

Thanks to you all for your suggestions.

I tried Max’s method first but what I should have told you is that
the pictures in the loop are not all the same size and because of
this the border doesn’t ‘cling’ (technical term) to the picture
bounds.


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options

Walter said

Also, if you want a border to “shrink-wrap” to an image…

Thanks for that Walter I will give that a go as well - “shrink-wrap”, yes better description than “cling”

David


offtopic mailing list
email@hidden
Update your subscriptions at:
http://freewaytalk.net/person/options